🔗 Share this article

Thhese days present a quite distinctive occurrence: the inaugural US procession of the overseers. Their attributes range in their expertise and characteristics, but they all share the identical goal – to avert an Israeli violation, or even demolition, of the unstable truce. Since the war concluded, there have been few days without at least one of the former president's representatives on the territory. Just this past week featured the likes of Jared Kushner, a businessman, JD Vance and a political figure – all appearing to carry out their duties.

The Israeli government keeps them busy. In only a few short period it launched a wave of strikes in Gaza after the loss of two Israeli military personnel – leading, based on accounts, in scores of Palestinian injuries. A number of officials urged a resumption of the war, and the Knesset enacted a early measure to incorporate the occupied territories. The American reaction was somehow between “no” and “hell no.”

However in several ways, the US leadership appears more intent on upholding the present, unstable phase of the truce than on progressing to the following: the rebuilding of the Gaza Strip. Concerning that, it seems the United States may have aspirations but few specific proposals.

For now, it remains unknown at what point the proposed international governing body will effectively begin operating, and the same is true for the designated military contingent – or even the makeup of its soldiers. On a recent day, a US official declared the United States would not force the structure of the foreign force on the Israeli government. But if Benjamin Netanyahu’s cabinet continues to refuse one alternative after another – as it did with the Ankara's proposal recently – what happens then? There is also the contrary point: which party will establish whether the forces favoured by the Israelis are even interested in the task?

The matter of the timeframe it will require to neutralize the militant group is just as ambiguous. “The expectation in the leadership is that the international security force is going to at this point assume responsibility in disarming Hamas,” remarked the official recently. “It’s may need a while.” Trump further emphasized the lack of clarity, declaring in an discussion recently that there is no “rigid” timeline for Hamas to demilitarize. So, theoretically, the unnamed elements of this not yet established global force could deploy to the territory while the organization's militants still remain in control. Would they be dealing with a governing body or a guerrilla movement? These are just a few of the issues arising. Others might question what the verdict will be for everyday Palestinians under current conditions, with the group persisting to attack its own opponents and dissidents.

Recent developments have afresh highlighted the blind spots of local media coverage on both sides of the Gaza border. Each source attempts to examine each potential perspective of Hamas’s violations of the truce. And, usually, the situation that the organization has been stalling the return of the bodies of killed Israeli hostages has taken over the news.

Conversely, coverage of civilian deaths in Gaza caused by Israeli operations has garnered minimal attention – or none. Consider the Israeli counter strikes after a recent southern Gaza event, in which two troops were fatally wounded. While local authorities claimed 44 fatalities, Israeli media analysts complained about the “light response,” which targeted only facilities.

That is nothing new. Over the recent few days, Gaza’s press agency accused Israeli forces of violating the truce with Hamas multiple occasions since the truce came into effect, resulting in the loss of dozens of individuals and injuring an additional 143. The claim seemed insignificant to most Israeli media outlets – it was simply absent. That included accounts that eleven members of a local household were fatally shot by Israeli troops last Friday.

Gaza’s rescue organization stated the individuals had been attempting to go back to their home in the a Gaza City area of the city when the vehicle they were in was targeted for allegedly crossing the “yellow line” that demarcates zones under Israeli military authority. That yellow line is invisible to the ordinary view and shows up just on charts and in government records – sometimes not obtainable to average residents in the area.

Even that occurrence barely got a note in Israeli news outlets. Channel 13 News mentioned it in passing on its digital site, citing an IDF spokesperson who stated that after a suspect vehicle was identified, troops discharged cautionary rounds towards it, “but the vehicle kept to move toward the soldiers in a way that created an imminent danger to them. The soldiers engaged to eliminate the danger, in accordance with the truce.” No fatalities were claimed.

Given this perspective, it is no surprise numerous Israelis think Hamas exclusively is to blame for breaking the truce. That perception risks fuelling appeals for a tougher strategy in the region.

Eventually – perhaps in the near future – it will not be adequate for all the president’s men to play caretakers, instructing the Israeli government what to avoid. They will {have to|need