Federal Officials Demands Exclusion of Transgender Issues from Sexual Health Curricula, Several States Comply

At least eleven jurisdictions and two territories have agreed to a new demand from the Trump administration to remove references of transgender issues and the presence of transgender and non-binary individuals from a national sex education initiative, officials stated.

The administration established a recent cutoff for removing these mentions, threatening the loss of substantial government funding. Almost every of the agreeing jurisdictions have Republican-controlled state legislatures and mostly Republican state leaders.

Court Battles and Financial Disputes

An additional sixteen jurisdictions and Washington DC have initiated legal action against the administration's demand, arguing it infringes on Congressional authority, which created the $75m sexual health initiative, known as the Personal Responsibility Education Program (Prep).

All states participating in the legal challenge are led by Democratic state executives.

In a recent court order, a federal judge prevented the HHS agency, which manages the program, from withholding funding to the suing jurisdictions if they refuse to comply.

“The agency does not demonstrate that the new grant conditions are reasonable, let alone offer any reasonable explanation, other than an excuse, for its actions,” wrote the judge, a federal jurist in the state. “HHS provides no evidence that it made informed determinations or took into account the legal goals.”

Program Goals and Federal Review

Prep seeks to inform adolescents on positive interactions and how to prevent unplanned parenthood and the transmission of STIs.

In the spring, the Trump administration demanded all jurisdictions obtaining program money to provide a version of their educational materials to the department and its agency, the ACF office, for a health content assessment.

By late summer, the administration sent letters to 46 states and territories, stating that, during the review, it had found “content in the educational programs that deviate from the scope of the program's legal framework.”

In particular, the government claimed it had identified evidence of “gender-related concepts,” a term often used by rightwing factions to refer to the idea that identity is a changeable cultural concept and that transgender individuals are real.

Specific Examples of Requested Changes

The government directed Illinois to drop a lesson that stated: “Adolescents may identify in ways that don’t conform with their assigned gender.”

It told North Carolina to delete a line from a middle school lesson that read: “People of all sexual orientations and gender identities need to know how to avoid unplanned pregnancy and infections.”

Moreover, health instructors in many jurisdictions could no longer be told to “demonstrate acceptance and respect for all participants, irrespective of individual traits, including race, cultural background, faith, social class, orientation or identity,” based on the notices dispatched to jurisdictions.

Official Statements and Jurisdictional Reactions

“Oversight is imminent,” said a federal official, interim leader of the Administration for Children and Families, in a announcement. “Federal funds will not be used to poison the minds of the youth or promote dangerous ideological agendas.”

Multiple jurisdictions and territories stated they would remove the content or had completed the process. These consist of Alaska, Georgia, Iowa, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, West Virginia and Wyoming, as well as the two territories.

Another pair of jurisdictions, the states, said their Prep curricula never included the language mentioned in the administration’s letters.

Impact on Youth and Mental Health

Collectively, these jurisdictions are home to over 120k trans people aged 13 to 17, based on projections from a research institute.

“When the aim is to support youth and give them a secure environment, I’m not sure why we are stomping on the most vulnerable youth in the community,” commented Cindi Huss, who leads Rise that provides sex education in one state.

“If authorities state that there’s something wrong with you and the educators aren’t allowed to provide information or they have to out you to your parents – when you know that that’s not secure – that’s detrimental to psychological well-being.”

Almost 50% of trans and non-binary youth contemplated self-harm in the past year, according to a recent study from a mental health organization. Educational backing for these adolescents is associated with reduced numbers of self-harm attempts, the organization discovered.

Previous Actions and Ongoing Disputes

Earlier this year, the federal government ordered California to remove mentions to transgender topics from its educational program.

When the Democratic-led state declined, the government withdrew its Prep grant, eliminating about $12 million in federal funding and halting health initiatives in educational institutions, youth centers and care facilities.

The state agency is challenging the withdrawal. To date, it has been unable to make up for the withdrawn money.

The government has also informed educators who obtain money from two other federal sex education initiatives, the $50m SRAE program and the $101m Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program (TPPP), that they cannot teach about “gender ideology.”

An recent judicial ruling blocked the government from altering one program, while the Monday court order prohibits it from modifying SRAE in the Democratic states that sued over Prep.

The Administration for Children and Families did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Veronica Stevens
Veronica Stevens

Digital marketing specialist with over 8 years of experience, passionate about helping businesses grow through data-driven strategies.